Mission Impossible Isolates The Federal Reserve

Nominal GDP reveals the failure of economic policy 

Germany’s Finance Minister explains

Guardian Suggests Central Banks stand aside

Growing list of dissenters isolates the Fed on rate rises

ECRI explains that the economic cycle turned down 9 months ago

Crucial to allocate according to real economic cycles and techniques to handle volatility

——————————-

Nominal GDP reveals the failure of economic policy 

It is worth spending some time understanding the results from the biggest economic experiment of all time – global money printing to support banks and markets since 2008. This has now reached well into the 10s of Trillions in aggregate across the globe over the last 7 years or so.

Take a good look at the charts above.0915Durable-Goods-090915-2 Just in the US, QE has exploded to over $4 trillion. This, along with many other measures, was supposed to provide a huge boost to both growth and inflation, but it just hasn’t happened.

If you add growth and inflation together you get nominal GDP growth shown in the second chart. This is the best single measure of the success of QE, and the Fed’s ability to reflate the economy.  However, the second chart shows that nominal GDP has rapidly collapsed to its lowest level since the 1950s! Exactly the opposite result. So the experiment is failing spectacularly.

Germany’s Finance Minister explains

As has been said before, printing money does not produce growth, and printing money into a closed financial system does not produce inflation. Germany’s Finance Minister seems to think so too.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-09-08/germanys-schaeuble-blasts-central-banks-money-printing-neither-original-nor-serious

As previously described, what QE has done0915margindebt is enormously boost financial assets. However, can stock prices forever diverge from economic growth and inflation by being floated on a sea of printed money with the help of financial engineering?

 

Guardian Suggests Central Banks stand aside

This Guardian article suggests that the central banks should not even try as any attempt will ultimately prove to be futile.

http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/aug/30/central-banks-cant-save-markets-crash-shouldnt-try

However, in most Wall Street and Federal Reserve circles they apparently don’t see this effort as “Mission Impossible”, or perhaps they do not know what else to do. The common response is to keep trying. For example, here is the opinion of Chief Economist Willem Buiter of  Citibank.

“We expect to see QE #N, where N could become a large integer, as part of the monetary policy response in the US and the UK, and QEE2 in Japan.

More of what has already failed.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-09-09/buiter-only-helicopter-money-can-save-world-next-recession

In the middle of all this, somehow the 0915Employment-16-54-090915Federal Reserve has been promoting the idea of raising rates this year. According to the view from Fed the economy is doing well enough to actually tighten policy. Undeterred by 6 consecutive years of having incorrectly held a similar view it seems to be stubbornly sticking to what its models say. Could it possibly be time for a review?

Growing list of dissenters isolates the Fed on rate rises

However, it seems that the Fed is becoming increasingly isolated as most of its peers seem to be taking a diametrically opposite view, including the IMF, and now the World Bank chief economist who warns that the Fed risks triggering “panic and turmoil” in emerging markets if they raise rates in September.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-09-08/fed-hike-will-result-panic-and-turmoil-and-new-emerging-market-crisis-warns-world-ba

Adding his name to the list is Larry Summers, who chimed in yesterday with an article simply titled “why the fed must stand still on rates”.

http://larrysummers.com/2015/09/09/why-the-fed-must-stand-still-on-rates/

Even J P Morgan seems to have stepped back from the Fed narrative.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-09-08/four-reasons-why-jpmorgan-no-longer-bullish-us-stocks

And Goldman Sachs says the September rate hike is not even close.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-09-07/september-rate-hike-not-even-close-goldmans-seven-reasons-why-yellen-will-delay-agai

While Deutsche Bank calls a rate hike simply a policy error.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-09-05/europes-biggest-bank-dares-ask-fed-preparing-controlled-demolition-stock-market

What is an investor to do when the 0915Rate_hike_cartoon_09.04.2015_normalFederal Reserve seems so much at odds with so many of its peers, and is engaged in an unsustainable “Mission Impossible” of perpetually inflating financial assets even as they continue to diverge from the underlying economy? If the Fed is tasking itself with holding asset prices at high levels, then raising rates when the economy is weak and slowing, with margin debt near all time record levels seems like a strange strategy to a growing and influential majority.

Here is a great list of charts showing a range of key indexes of how the economy is doing. You can decide for yourself if now seems like a good time to raise interest rates.

http://streettalklive.com/index.php/blog.html?id=2885

ECRI explains that the economic cycle turned down 9 months ago

ECRI has a great track record on calling0915ECRIcoindex US economic cycles. In the Bloomberg interview yesterday, in the link below, the current situation looks very clear. The US economic cycle peaked around 9 months ago and since then then trend has been firmly down.

https://www.businesscycle.com/ecri-news-events/news-details/economic-cycle-research-ecri-us-outlook-jobs-world-trade-growth-fed

The Federal Reserve only has three more meetings this year, so it is running out of opportunities to deliver its repeatedly stated intention to raise rates this year. It faces the dilemma of a potential policy error by raising rates, or once again trying to quietly step back from its narrative that all the trillions of QE and 7 years of zero interest rates still isn’t quite enough, but never mind, following this “transient” period their consistently wrong forecasts assure them that all is well.

It remains crucial to position according to real economic cycles, with techniques for negotiating high and erratic volatility.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This entry was posted in Market Notes and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *